The intensity of the light emitted by stars and other astronomical
objects varies strongly with wavelength. Thus, the apparent magnitude,
, observed for a given star by a detector depends on the range of
wavelengths to which the detector is sensitive; a detector sensitive
to red light will usually record a different brightness than one
sensitive to blue light.
The first estimates of stellar magnitudes were made either using the
unaided eye or later by direct observation through a telescope.
Magnitudes estimated in this way are referred to as visual
magnitudes,
4. The sensitivity
of the human eye peaks at a wavelength of around 5500Å.
The bolometric magnitude,
, is the notional magnitude
measured across all wavelengths. Clearly the bolometric magnitude
cannot be measured directly, because of absorption in the terrestrial
atmosphere (see Section
) and the practical difficulties
of constructing a detector which will respond to a sufficiently wide
range of wavelengths. The bolometric correction is the difference
between
and
:
| (10) |
Note, however, that sometimes the opposite sign is given to
.
The concept of a bolometric magnitude is only really applicable to
stars, which to a first approximation emit thermal radiation as black
bodies. The bolometric correction is used to derive an approximation
to the bolometric magnitude from the observed one. It would clearly
be absurd to try to apply a bolometric correction to the observed visual
magnitude of some exotic object which was emitting most of its energy
non-thermally in the X-ray or radio regions of the spectrum.
Schmidt-Kaler[65] gives tables of stellar bolometric
corrections.
Another type of magnitude which is sometimes encountered is the photographic magnitude,
. Photographic magnitudes were
determined from the brightness of star images recorded on photographic
plates and thus are determined by the wavelength sensitivity of the
photographic plate. Early photographic plates were relatively more
sensitive to blue than to red light and the effective wavelength
of photographic magnitudes is about 4200Å. Note that photographic
magnitudes refer to early plates exposed without a filter. Using a
combination of more modern emulsions and filters it is, of course,
possible to expose plates which are sensitive to different wave-bands.
However, modern photometric systems are defined for photoelectric, or latterly, CCD detectors. In modern usage a photometric system comprises a set of discrete wave-bands, each with a known sensitivity to incident radiation. The sensitivity is defined by the detectors and filters used. Additionally a set of primary standard stars are provided for the system which define its magnitude scale. Photometric systems are usually categorised according to the widths of their passbands:
The optical region of the spectrum is only wide enough to accommodate three or four non-overlapping wide bands. A plethora of photometric systems have been devised and a large number remain in regular use. The criteria for designing photometric systems and descriptions of the more common systems are given by Sterken and Manfroid[67], Straizys[70], Lamla[49], Golay[32] and Jaschek and Jaschek[40]. Some of the more common ones are summarised below.
includes the basic details
of the Johnson-Morgan system and Figure
shows the general
form of the filter transmission curves. Tabulations of these curves
are given by Jaschek and Jaschek[40].
The Johnson-Morganand
bands should not be confused with the similar, and similarly named, bands in the Cousins VRI system[13,14]. The Cousins
band (complemented by
and
) is identical to the Johnson-Morgan system. However, the Cousins
and
bands respectively have wavelengths of 6700Å and 8100Å and thus both are bluer than the corresponding Johnson-Morgan bands. They are usually indicated by
, where `C' stands for `Cape'. For further details see Straizys[70], pp294-296 and pp309-312.
The zero points of the UBV system are chosen so that for a star
of spectral type A0 which is unaffected by interstellar reddening (see
Appendix
)
. Despite its ubiquity the
UBV system has some disadvantages. In particular, the short
wavelength cutoff of the
filter is partly defined by the
terrestrial atmosphere rather than the detector or filter. Thus, the
cutoff (and hence the observed magnitudes) can vary with altitude,
geographic location and atmospheric conditions.
|
|
. Filter
transmission curves for the Strömgren system are given by Jaschek and
Jaschek[40]. Strömgren
. The bands are matched to, and share
the same names as, the windows in which the terrestrial atmosphere is
transparent at infrared wavelengths (see Section
). The
The
system is less well-standardised than other systems and
each observatory will often define its own system which differs slightly
from the others. These differences arise because the atmospheric
windows which are transparent at infrared wavelengths are themselves
different at different observatories and, in particular, vary with
altitude. Consequently, great care must be exercised in inter-comparing
observations made at different observatories.
Table
summarises some of the more common
systems.
For further details see Bersanelli et al.[4],
Bouchetet al.[5] and Straizys[70],
pp292-307. Leggett[54] gives details of the transformations
between the various infrared systems. Simons and Tokunaga[66]
have recently reported an attempt to standardise infrared photometric
systems.
|
|
As for the original Johnson-Morgan system, the zero point of the
JHKLM system is defined so that an unreddened A0 star has the
same magnitude in all colours:
.
The standard star used is Vega (
Lyræ).
Observing programmes which use a given photometric system need not
necessarily observe in all the bands of that system. Often only some,
or perhaps even only one, of the bands will be used. The choice of bands
will be dictated by the aims of the programme and the observing time
available.
The CCD Photometric Calibration Cookbook